Saturday, March 13, 2010

Revision of Mean Value Theorem

Well, I'm too lazy to go back and change my first post, so I'd rather just make a new post, which contains only the revisions, not the entire post all over again. If anyone wants to see the first post for some reason, the link should be on the right side of the screen somewhere.

Why not-differentiable and discontinuous functions fail the Mean Value Theorem:

Ok, so apparently why they fail needed some revision, so let's try this again. Let us think of the function f(x)=x^2, because everyone knows how it looks. We all know it passes the Mean Value Theorem, but let's see why. There are no discontinuities, cusps, corners, or anything of the sort. As we get closer to x=0, the derivative of f gets closer to 0, and as we leave 0 towards the positive side, the derivative becomes positive. That is the general reason why differentiable functions are guarenteed a point where slope of the tangent line at x=c equals the slope of the secant line: there is a smooth transition in the sign of the derivative. If we are talking about straight line, the tangent line is the line itself, so there is no worry. Ugh...explaining with words is becoming difficult, so lets look at pictures.



Ok, again, I'm terrible with the size of picture, so I'll just explain what is happening. The graph is f(x)=x^(4/5) and the interval we are considering is [-1,1]. The secant line is y=1. There is a cusp at x=0. Because it's continuous but not differentiable, it fails the Mean Value Theorem. Why? If we examine the derivative of f, we see that it's negative at x<0>0. But if we think back to f(x)=x^2, it lacks a vital charecteristic. There is no smooth transition in the derivative from negative to zero to positive, as all curves have. In this graph, the derivative is negative, goes to a point without a derivative, and then is suddenly positive. The smooth transition just isn't there. That is why there is no guarenteed value for which the slope of the tangent line equals the slope of the secant line. I'm guessing the explanation is still a little fuzzy, so let's look at another picture.



This graph is the graph of a piecewise function, composed of y=x^2+1 from [-1,0] and y=x from (0,3], where there is a jump discontinuity at x=0 and has a secant line of y=x/4+(9/4). We know it fails the mean value theorem, but why? The exact same reason as the example above. We don't see that smooth transition in the derivative from negative to zero to positive. It goes from negative to a point where there is no derivative (due to the discontinuity), and then the derivative is thrust into being positive. The derivative doesn't naturally change but changes abruptly and suddenly. It misses values for the derivative, values the derivative can't be without the smooth transition (same as in the example above) which is why functions that aren't differentiable or continuous can't have a guarenteed point where the slope of the tangent line equals the slope of the secant line.

Wow, that was a lot of writing. That should explain everything.
(P.S. You should put more videos like that, Ms. Hwang. That contraption was extremely entertaining.)

8 comments:

  1. This is really helpful & in-depth.
    However, i have one question: So if the slope abruptly changes from positive to negative, the function fails the mean value theorem? Is this always true?

    ReplyDelete
  2. ok... so that was two questions. lol.

    ReplyDelete
  3. your blog is very... hmmm comical... did i use the right word... its very funny.. i like it. and very helpful too. thank you. :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like the comment related to a "smooth transition"! It allows me to see the mean value theorem in a different way!
    Oh and I like your piecewise! I tried making one, and it just didn't work! hahah (:

    ReplyDelete
  5. hey how did you make the piecewise, i also tried but i couldn't :(...hey but even though you were lazy you did a good job when explainig everything!...liked it

    ReplyDelete
  6. bet you used paint to make ur piece wise xD cuz i sure no i did anyways good explanations. very . . . creative

    ReplyDelete
  7. u are a pro at this wish i had this talent

    ReplyDelete
  8. i agree with victor, your to smart to be with us simple people.

    ReplyDelete